Thursday, October 29, 2009
catching up
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Hansel and Gretel: The Halloween Addition
And now for a bit of literary criticism this morning.
I asked my dear friend Catherine to do a post on fairy tales and she suggested we put it up around Halloween. Fairy tales, on Halloween? You ask. So did I. Apparently the roots are a lot scarier than we know today. Catherine is a fantastic literary critic and has taken an academic eye to Hansel and Gretel. I hope you enjoy her thoughts as much as I did.
As of right now, historians believe that Halloween (shape-shifted from All Hallows Evening) is the step-child of Samhain, a Celtic festival, which roughly translates to “summer’s end”, held at the end of the harvest season. But, as with most celebrations of the harvest, Samhain also honors the deceased members of the community. It is believed that this festival of the dead was carried over to North America during the Great Irish Famine of 1845-1852, and that the present day Halloween, the traditions of trick or treating, bobbing for apples, and spooky costumes were all remnants of those darker, and more superstitious, times.
With that in mind, I thought the Brothers Grimm’s terrifying Hansel and Gretel was the perfect story to look at this month!
Hansel and Gretel combines several important and spooky motifs: the wicked step-mother, the evil witch, the abandonment of children, the edible house, the tricking of the witch, and the triumph over evil.
During the time of Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm, fairy tales were much, much darker than they are today. Now, because they are so frightening, some parents won’t even consider telling a tale from the Brothers Grimm.
But sometimes a good scare is exactly what a child wants. Though unlike Halloween, the Brothers Grimm deliver a moral lesson, one that every child must learn.
In the beginning, Hansel and Gretel’s family “had very little to bite or sup, and once, when there was great dearth in the land, [their father] could not even gain the daily bread.” Much to the father’s chagrin, the step-mother (who is actually the real mother in a much older version!) tells her husband that in order to save themselves they must abandon the children out in the woods.
According to Bruno Bettleheim (whose favorite fairy tale happens to be Hansel and Gretel), the Mother represents the source of all food to the children, which is why they still want to return home after being deserted. This psychological interpretation is about dependence, in fact, Bettleheim says that, “before a child has the courage to embark on the voyage of finding himself, of becoming an independent person through meeting the world, he can develop initiative only in trying to return to passivity, to secure for himself eternally dependent gratification.” (The Uses of Enchantment)
But, regression and denial will not get poor Hansel and Gretel anywhere. They must overcome their primitive desires to return to their Mother, the womb, or to a time when they were completely taken care of and did not have existential dilemmas of their own that they had to solve.
Stranded in the woods, the children finally come upon a house, albeit a house made of candy, and they immediately eat the house. It doesn’t occur to them that the house could be a place of shelter or a home.
“So Hansel reached up and broke off a bit of the roof, just to see how it tasted, and Gretel stood by the window and gnawed at it. Then they heard a thin voice from inside,”
When the witch asks them who is eating at her house (in a voice that could be misconstrued as the children’s consciences), they answer that it is the wind, knowing full well that they are stealing, and worse, eating this witch out of house and home, something their step-mother feared they might do and therefore abandoned them.
Such unrestrained greediness cannot lead to anything good, especially in the morally structured world of fairy tales.
At first the witch is kind, “she took them each by the hand, and led them into her little house. And there, they found a good meal laid out, of milk and pancakes, with sugar, apples, and nuts. After that she showed them two little white beds, and Hansel and Gretel laid themselves down on them, and thought they were in heaven.”
But appearances are deceiving. Just as the children gobbled up the gingerbread house, the witch is equally determined to gobble them up!
The witch’s kindness and then inevitable transformation are symbolic of the inadequacies and betrayal of the Mother.
When a child is first born the Mother is the entire world, but even then, the Mother cannot possibly satisfy all of the child’s needs like she once did before the child was born. At the moment of birth the separation between Mother and child begins. As the child ages, the Mother no longer serves the child unequivocally, but begins to focus more of her energy on herself. For the child, this leads to rage and frustration with the Mother, as well as feelings of abandonment.
It is important to note that the first time Hansel and Gretel are abandoned, Hansel saves them, but it is Gretel that pushes the witch into the oven. Hansel and Gretel is one of the few tales that stresses the importance of siblings cooperation. The children move from depending on their parents, which will only lead them to a life of regression, to depending on each other, on people their own age. (This last step is key to understanding Roald Dahl’s children’s fiction.)
In order to stand to their full height as separate individuals, children must overcome their desire to return to infancy. They must also learn to face their fears, their anxieties, and their misgivings, as embodied in the human-like appearance of the witch. In Hansel and Gretel, both the step-mother and the witch must die for the children to transcend their infantile dependence and finally grow up.
Happy Halloween!
Sunday, October 25, 2009
No help, please
Friday, October 23, 2009
Reading to Felix
About a week after my son Felix was born, we started reading The Iliad together.
Ok, so I did the reading while he lay in my lap looking cute, staring at the ceiling, or, more often than not, sleeping. I had no pretensions that he was paying attention or getting anything from the work itself. Though if he was, the themes of the epic—mortality, morality, free will versus fate—seemed an appropriate introduction to the human experience. Really, my hope was that the intonation and cadence of my voice giving breath to the musical rhythm of Homer’s verse (in the vibrant translation of Stanley Lombardo) would make some deep, lasting impression on his consciousness, planting the seeds of language right from the start. Some pregnancy books actually recommend reading to the fetus in-utero for a similar reason, but I felt ridiculous addressing my wife’s ripe belly.
We made our way through the first few books of The Iliad before Felix out grew it at a month old. Sitting still for long periods of time was something newborns do—big babies want to move and explore the world around them! So my wife and I introduced block books.
Again, we didn’t care about the actual content so much as his experience with the book as an object. Not surprisingly, pictures excited him right from the get go. Warm colored objects in particular drew his gaze. His favorite was a Baby Einstein book called Mirror Me! The bold, blocky faces made him coo and hoot, and he flashed some of his first smiles to himself in the mirror. Another favorite was the Usborne Touchy Feely That’s Not My Bear. The repetition of the words “that’s not my bear” inspired me to sing rather than read it to him—again drawing attention to the rhythm and musicality of language, and inspiring giggles at daddy’s off-key crooning.
Soon Felix was sitting for longer periods and had developed better eyesight. One afternoon, I propped him up against the pillows and read him Dr. Seuss’s The Lorax. He loved the orange, flame shaped little Lorax, and began ooh, ooh, oohing whenever he saw him. I could see his eyes scanning the page every time I turned, trying to locate the fuzzy little character. This was the first time I witnessed him being engaged by a character on the page, and it was thrilling. Felix was creating his own story, or game if you like, of find the Lorax. In later readings, as Felix became more adept with his hands, he reached out, trying to grab him. This book remains one of his favorite reads.
Improved hand eye coordination has allowed Felix to get involved with reading by turning pages. The thin paper of picture books is more challenging, but block and fuzzy books he flips through with ease. Sometimes, he turns them so fast I don’t have the opportunity to read him the words.
This isn’t to imply that words themselves don’t fascinate him, because they do. Black type on white pages, whether in the form of language or the notes of the sheet music propped up on our piano, intrigue him. The pages he responds to the most in Peggy Rathman’s Goodnight Gorilla aren’t the ones with pictures, but the ones when the lights go out and the character’s word bubbles hover on a black field. He reaches for the letters, as if he could grab them from the page. He does the same thing when sitting in my lap while I read The New Yorker. I like to think that he knows these markings are special.
Felix turns five months next week, and already he displays an excitement and warmth towards books. He’s building a positive relationship with them, which my wife and I hope will stay with him his whole life. The most basic pleasure he experiences with books as physical objects is similar to that some bibliophiles feel when they smell and feel an especially lovely old tome. It’s the very beginnings of a love we’ll nurture and feed in the months and years to come.